In July 2009 Fietshalte/W competed with 60 other designs in Brains Eindhoven, a call for innovative, creative and socially relevant ideas for the city.
click here to view our application at the Brains website.
26.8.09
13.5.09
Fietshalte/W, Netherlands 2009
Stop, Explore, Move along
with Gil Molho, Hessel Rippe, Nicole de Boer
dimensions approx. 13 x 3 x 3 meters
materials fiber-reinforced concrete, steel mesh, wood, polyester, PVC a.o.
Fietshalte (lit. 'Bike-Stop') is a bicycle-friendly drive-thru - a lightweight structure placed next to bicycle lanes along parks, urban traffic or in the countryside. The station functions as rest area and info-box, and can be fitted with lighting, display panels and other devices. As it is open to access for cyclists, rollerbladers and pedestrians, Fietshalte/W offers a chance to stop, examine and experience one's surroundings, promoting recreational cycling in the countryside and in the city.
Fietshalte/W is a registered project.
Four versions of Fietshalte/W, corresponding to four primary settings, are proposed:
1) scenic 2) industrial 3) renewing neighborhoods 4) daily route to work.
Each station is site-specific in form and content. Together the stations form a city network of information and communication hotspots. Locations in Eindhoven may include the Karpendonkse Park, Kanaaldijk Zuid, Strip-S, Woensel-West and the High-Tech Campus.
On Sunday 10th May, Fietshalte/W (W for Woensel) was first presented in a public stall on Groenewoudseweg in the Woensel-West biennal Lentemarkt, receiving favourable responses.
15.4.09
31.3.09
competition, Netherlands 2009
Living Sequences Wonen in Reeksen
(r)evolving community in Twente, the Netherlands
with Ruth van Eck-Rotholz
Dimensions
5000 m² plan subdivided into 4 X 1250 m² plots incl. central courtyard
max. building height 11 meters
Competition Slogan
“Community living in a rural setting” and “Build your own freedom naturally”
Living Sequences is a residential module dealing with the traditional barn-house and courtyard typology in a broader sense. This main requirement was reinterpreted by adding another focal point – the prevalent North-South axis, triggering the general layout. The idea of a clear, dominant feature within the residential functions led to an initial sketch of masses and joints, suggesting a hinge or pivot. The result is a partitioned residence defined by sequences – multi-purpose spaces providing light and a new material within the basic module of an elongated balloon frame. These in-betweens mark a distinctive entrance to the house and are to be used as a platform for growth and re-interpretation. The goal is a cost-effective, sober prototype with an added value – the horizontal-vertical interplay of rooms, from which a variety of personal spaces and living structures can emerge.
The central feature is a public court. This serves as traffic circle and organizes the plots and their relation to each other. The plan consists of four houses, of which two face the court and two turn aside for added privacy. A small part of each plot is provided to the narrow entrance path to optimize the entrance, receiving a green central area in return. Using natural phenomena as a guideline for design, the neighbors face each other and the open spaces outside, linked together by the incoming road, the square, and by their common use of sunlight, while each has room to expand and grow in their own yards.
Two partitions split the house into three sections. The first partition includes the stairway, which together with the main entrance links kitchen, dining room and garage; the second partition lies between these high-activity zones and the guest and children wing. Alternatively, this could become an adolescent’s side, or back door on ground floor.
The partition suggests a new version of the ante-chamber: a modular space dividing the core – kitchen and master bedroom - from the representative - dining room, guest rooms and study. Functions may differ and be replaced but the tempo is maintained by the two partitions. The entire house grows at a natural pace – the height changing from public to private functions, the meandering movement of the interior lending each volume a natural rhythm. Providing light and ventilation, the skylighted façade can also be curtained in order to stabilize temperature. The choice of material lies between glass or the more durable, eco-friendly ETFE. Yet more light can be let into the living room by opting for a double-height space in absence or in succession of the children’s area.
(r)evolving community in Twente, the Netherlands
with Ruth van Eck-Rotholz
Dimensions
5000 m² plan subdivided into 4 X 1250 m² plots incl. central courtyard
max. building height 11 meters
Competition Slogan
“Community living in a rural setting” and “Build your own freedom naturally”
Living Sequences is a residential module dealing with the traditional barn-house and courtyard typology in a broader sense. This main requirement was reinterpreted by adding another focal point – the prevalent North-South axis, triggering the general layout. The idea of a clear, dominant feature within the residential functions led to an initial sketch of masses and joints, suggesting a hinge or pivot. The result is a partitioned residence defined by sequences – multi-purpose spaces providing light and a new material within the basic module of an elongated balloon frame. These in-betweens mark a distinctive entrance to the house and are to be used as a platform for growth and re-interpretation. The goal is a cost-effective, sober prototype with an added value – the horizontal-vertical interplay of rooms, from which a variety of personal spaces and living structures can emerge.
The central feature is a public court. This serves as traffic circle and organizes the plots and their relation to each other. The plan consists of four houses, of which two face the court and two turn aside for added privacy. A small part of each plot is provided to the narrow entrance path to optimize the entrance, receiving a green central area in return. Using natural phenomena as a guideline for design, the neighbors face each other and the open spaces outside, linked together by the incoming road, the square, and by their common use of sunlight, while each has room to expand and grow in their own yards.
Two partitions split the house into three sections. The first partition includes the stairway, which together with the main entrance links kitchen, dining room and garage; the second partition lies between these high-activity zones and the guest and children wing. Alternatively, this could become an adolescent’s side, or back door on ground floor.
The partition suggests a new version of the ante-chamber: a modular space dividing the core – kitchen and master bedroom - from the representative - dining room, guest rooms and study. Functions may differ and be replaced but the tempo is maintained by the two partitions. The entire house grows at a natural pace – the height changing from public to private functions, the meandering movement of the interior lending each volume a natural rhythm. Providing light and ventilation, the skylighted façade can also be curtained in order to stabilize temperature. The choice of material lies between glass or the more durable, eco-friendly ETFE. Yet more light can be let into the living room by opting for a double-height space in absence or in succession of the children’s area.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
ten questions
architecture, so they tell us, is actually more about asking questions than providing answers. Here's ten of them:
Where does the built environment overlap with the un-built, the public spaces, the leftovers, the in-between?
Can the architectural discourse be influenced by non-architects, and if so, how?
What are the key factors in erecting a new building - or reusing an existing one?
In what way does architecture portray the identity of place?
Who are the forces behind today's monumental architecture? What is the extent of architectural research in any design process?
What are the up-and-coming tools of the trade, what do they express and which of them has effectively upgraded conventional, 'old-school' methods?
How is 'green' influencing today's buildings and cities?
To what limits, or on what scale should sustainable, eco-friendly elements be implemented as architectural requirements?
Will the sustainable issue stay on as a permanent factor in the future?
Where does the built environment overlap with the un-built, the public spaces, the leftovers, the in-between?
Can the architectural discourse be influenced by non-architects, and if so, how?
What are the key factors in erecting a new building - or reusing an existing one?
In what way does architecture portray the identity of place?
Who are the forces behind today's monumental architecture? What is the extent of architectural research in any design process?
What are the up-and-coming tools of the trade, what do they express and which of them has effectively upgraded conventional, 'old-school' methods?
How is 'green' influencing today's buildings and cities?
To what limits, or on what scale should sustainable, eco-friendly elements be implemented as architectural requirements?
Will the sustainable issue stay on as a permanent factor in the future?